Open access

From Evidence to Delivery: Building Readiness for Maternal Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination in Bangladesh

1 Evidence From Global and National Sources Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is often regarded as a mild respiratory infection in older children and adults, a perception that does not reflect the high risk it carries for young infants. RSV is a leading cause of acute lower respiratory tract infection, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia in children under […]

Original researchBangladeshAntenatal careMaternal ImmunisationRSVVaccination2026DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hcs2.70091

1 Evidence From Global and National Sources

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is often regarded as a mild respiratory infection in older children and adults, a perception that does not reflect the high risk it carries for young infants. RSV is a leading cause of acute lower respiratory tract infection, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia in children under 5 years of age [1].

Globally, RSV accounts for a large share of childhood respiratory morbidity and mortality, with the highest burden occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A comprehensive analysis published in Lancet in 2024 estimated that RSV causes 33 million lower respiratory tract infections, approximately 3.6 million hospitalisations, around 26,300 in-hospital deaths, and 118,200 total deaths each year among children under 5 years worldwide [1]. More than 95% of these deaths occurred in LMICs, with infants younger than 6 months bearing the highest risk of severe disease and death [2].

In Bangladesh, Global Burden of Disease analyses identify RSV as an important contributor to neonatal and infant mortality, with RSV-associated pneumonia contributing substantially to deaths among children under 5 years [3]. National surveillance data further support this burden, reporting RSV positivity of approximately 23% among children under 2 years presenting with severe acute respiratory infection [4]. This article discusses emerging global evidence on maternal RSV immunisation and its implications for implementation and readiness in Bangladesh and other LMIC settings.

2 Maternal Immunisation as a Preventive Strategy

Maternal immunisation provides a practical and effective way to protect these infants during early life. Vaccination during pregnancy induces maternal antibody responses that are transferred transplacentally to the foetus, providing passive immunity from birth through the first months of life. This approach is well established. In Bangladesh, maternal tetanus toxoid vaccination has been successfully implemented for decades, contributing to the near elimination of neonatal tetanus and highlighting the feasibility of pregnancy-based immunisation.

Globally, maternal vaccines for influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19 are now routinely recommended in many settings. The Abrysvo vaccine (Pfizer, New York, United States) was approved in 2023 following a specific development trajectory. In 2023, the first RSV vaccine for use during late pregnancy (32–36 weeks) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration; in September 2024, the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization made global recommendations to introduce passive immunisation (maternal vaccination and infant monoclonal antibodies) for the prevention of severe RSV disease in young infants; and in 2025 it received prequalification from the World Health Organization [5].

3 What the Trials and Early Implementation Studies Show

Recently, phase three trial data using an updated prefusion F protein-based vaccine (GSK, Rixensart, Belgium) showed vaccine efficacy exceeding 65% against severe RSV disease during early infancy [6].

Real-world evidence is now emerging. In 2024, Argentina incorporated the RSV prefusion F vaccine into its national immunisation schedule and delivered it through existing antenatal care (ANC) and vaccination services across public and private healthcare sectors [7, 8]. The programme achieved approximately 60% coverage among eligible pregnant women and was associated with a nearly 75% reduction in severe RSV disease among infants, while all RSV-associated in-hospital deaths occurred among infants born to unvaccinated mothers [8]. Argentina’s experience highlights the importance of provider engagement, maternal awareness, timely ANC attendance, and coordination across public and private healthcare sectors. Although direct comparison with Bangladesh is limited, these lessons may inform future maternal RSV vaccine introduction.

4 Readiness Challenges in Bangladesh

Despite achieving high coverage in childhood immunisation under the Expanded Programme on Immunization, Bangladesh does not yet have a dedicated maternal immunisation platform. ANC services are delivered through a mixed system, with a large proportion of women receiving care from private facilities. Given the important role of private-sector ANC services in Bangladesh, successful maternal RSV vaccine delivery would require coordination across public and private providers.

While maternal tetanus vaccination has been successfully implemented for decades [9], maternal RSV vaccination presents additional challenges because it must be delivered within a specific gestational window [7]. Late ANC initiation, incomplete follow-up, and variability in ANC quality may affect timely vaccine delivery. Although not directly comparable, antenatal corticosteroid use illustrates the feasibility of delivering time-sensitive interventions through routine ANC. Successful introduction will require strengthening ANC attendance, provider counselling, public awareness, and coordination across healthcare sectors.

5 Building Momentum Through Readiness Initiatives

Bangladesh is a participant in the Maternal Immunisation Readiness Network in Africa and Asia, a nine-country initiative supporting evidence generation, health system readiness, stakeholder engagement, and economic evaluation for maternal vaccines [10].

In 2025, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh and Irimi convened a national stakeholder workshop using the “6As” behavioural framework (namely Accountability, Access, Affordability, Awareness, Acceptance, and Activation) to identify barriers and potential solutions for maternal immunisation uptake. Key priorities included provider engagement, communication strategies, maternal awareness, provider recommendation, and timely ANC attendance as important determinants of maternal RSV vaccine uptake [11].

6 Implications for Policy and Practice

Discussions on maternal RSV vaccination have been initiated in Bangladesh. Policymakers may consider its future inclusion in national immunisation guidelines, aligned with World Health Organization recommendations and potential Gavi support. Integration into routine ANC across public and private sectors will require clear delivery pathways, provider training, and effective counselling tools. As Bangladesh transitions within the LMIC context and the global financing landscape evolves, affordability and long-term financing should remain important policy considerations.

7 Looking Forward

Maternal immunisation presents a promising opportunity to enhance protection for infants in early life while fostering stronger connections between maternal and child health services. In Bangladesh, the establishment of a dedicated maternal immunisation platform could support the equitable introduction of future maternal vaccines, though several implementation and health-system considerations will need to be addressed.

Author Contributions

Ridwana Maher Manna: conceptualisation, investigation, visualisation, writing – original draft. Siobhan L. Johnstone: methodology, validation, writing – review and editing. Pradip Chandra: resources, validation, writing – review and editing. Michelle J. Groome: methodology, validation, writing – review and editing. Shams El Arifeen: project administration, validation, supervision, writing – review and editing. Aniqa Tasnim Hossain: project administration, methodology, validation, supervision, writing – review and editing.

Acknowledgements

In this article, artificial intelligence (GPT-5.5) was used solely for language editing, including grammar correction, typographical error correction, and word count reduction. Typical prompts requested improvements in grammar, language, readability, and conciseness while preserving the original scientific meaning. No artificial intelligence tools were used to generate or interpret the scientific content, analyses, figures, or conclusions of the manuscript. All artificial intelligence-assisted edits were carefully reviewed by the authors, who take full responsibility for the final content of the manuscript.

    Publication record

    Final article information

    Final publication metadata, authorship, persistent identifier, reference list and downloadable research files.

    Authorship

    Authors and affiliations

    Ridwana Maher Manna, Siobhan L. Johnstone, Pradip Chandra, Michelle J. Groome, Shams El Arifeen, Aniqa Tasnim Hossain1 Maternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh | 2 South African Medical Research Council Vaccines & Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Corresponding author: Ridwana Maher Manna (ridwana.manna@icddrb.org)

    DOI

    Digital Object Identifier

    https://doi.org/10.1002/hcs2.70091
    Downloads

    Article files

    PDF
    Full research article

    Final publication · PDF

    Download
    Final references

    References

    1. 1N. I. Mazur, M. T. Caballero, and M. C. Nunes, “Severe Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Children: Burden, Management, and Emerging Therapies,” Lancet 404, no. 10458 (2024): 1143–1156
    2. 2Y. Li, X. Wang, D. M. Blau, et al., “Global, Regional, and National Disease Burden Estimates of Acute Lower Respiratory Infections Due to Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Children Younger Than 5 Years in 2019: A Systematic Analysis,” Lancet 399, no. 10340 (2022): 2047–2064, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00478-0.
    3. 3“GBD Compare,” Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, published October 12, 2025, http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare.
    4. 4“National Influenza Surveillance,” Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research, accessed June 11, 2026, https://www.iedcr.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=131&Itemid=174.
    5. 5“WHO Prequalifies First Maternal Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine,” World Health Organization, published March 19, 2025, https://www.who.int/news/item/19-03-2025-who-prequalifies-first-maternal-respiratory-syncytial-virus-vaccine.
    6. 6I. Dieussaert, J. Hyung Kim, S. Luik, et al., “RSV Prefusion F Protein–Based Maternal Vaccine—Preterm Birth and Other Outcomes,” New England Journal of Medicine 390, no. 11 (2024): 1009–1021, https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2305478.
    7. 7C. Pecenka, E. Sparrow, D. R. Feikin, et al., “Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination and Immunoprophylaxis: Realising the Potential for Protection of Young Children,” Lancet 404, no. 10458 (2024): 1157–1170, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01699-4.
    8. 8G. Pérez Marc, C. Vizzotti, D. B. Fell, et al., “Real-World Effectiveness of RSVpreF Vaccination During Pregnancy Against RSV-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Disease Leading to Hospitalisation in Infants During the 2024 RSV Season in Argentina (BERNI Study): A Multicentre, Retrospective, Test-Negative, Case–Control Study,” Lancet Infectious Diseases 25, no. 9 (2025): 1044–1054, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00156-2.
    9. 9G. Dağdeviren, G. Örgül, A. Yücel, and D. Şahin, “Tetanus Vaccine During Pregnancy: Data of a Tertiary Hospital in Turkey,” Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 50, no. 8 (2020): 1903–1908, https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2001-77.
    10. 10“MIRNA, The Maternal Immunisation Readiness Network in Africa & Asia,” MIRNA, accessed June 11, 2026, https://mirna.tghn.org.
    11. 11“Nurturing public trust in public health,” Irimi, accessed June 11, 2026, https://irimi.co/en.